<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Governmenty stuff.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://viscariello.com/vdv/2010/02/28/governmenty-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://viscariello.com/vdv/2010/02/28/governmenty-stuff/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Viscariello</title>
		<link>http://viscariello.com/vdv/2010/02/28/governmenty-stuff/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Viscariello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viscariello.com/vdv/?p=384#comment-716</guid>
		<description>I think you meant 3/5 majority, unless my reading skills and/or knowledge of government have failed me, but either way, it takes a simple majority to change the rules, according to (A) the Constitution and (B) the Supreme Court. Politics might dictate otherwise, but it only takes a majority with guts--or even a Vice-President with the guts to overrule the parliamentarian, which is the VP&#039;s prerogative as President of the Senate--to change the rules--even Rule 22.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant 3/5 majority, unless my reading skills and/or knowledge of government have failed me, but either way, it takes a simple majority to change the rules, according to (A) the Constitution and (B) the Supreme Court. Politics might dictate otherwise, but it only takes a majority with guts&#8211;or even a Vice-President with the guts to overrule the parliamentarian, which is the VP&#8217;s prerogative as President of the Senate&#8211;to change the rules&#8211;even Rule 22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Hmnahmna</title>
		<link>http://viscariello.com/vdv/2010/02/28/governmenty-stuff/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Hmnahmna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viscariello.com/vdv/?p=384#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Current Senate rules require a 3/4 majority to break a filibuster on changing the rules.  Good luck with that one.

http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXXII</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current Senate rules require a 3/4 majority to break a filibuster on changing the rules.  Good luck with that one.</p>
<p><a href="http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXXII" rel="nofollow">http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXXII</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blonde</title>
		<link>http://viscariello.com/vdv/2010/02/28/governmenty-stuff/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Blonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viscariello.com/vdv/?p=384#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Ironically enough due to my alias,

I was speaking of the reconciliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically enough due to my alias,</p>
<p>I was speaking of the reconciliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blonde</title>
		<link>http://viscariello.com/vdv/2010/02/28/governmenty-stuff/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Blonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viscariello.com/vdv/?p=384#comment-711</guid>
		<description>On many conservative news sources I feel like I&#039;ve heard a hundred repetitive complaints about the filibuster and it&#039;s possible &quot;unethical&quot; and &quot;unconstitutional&quot; use by the democrats. Interestingly enough, historically 16 of the 22 times it has been utilized it was the republicans who did so. I hate politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On many conservative news sources I feel like I&#8217;ve heard a hundred repetitive complaints about the filibuster and it&#8217;s possible &#8220;unethical&#8221; and &#8220;unconstitutional&#8221; use by the democrats. Interestingly enough, historically 16 of the 22 times it has been utilized it was the republicans who did so. I hate politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

